Agent ranking
composite score · 22% depth reached, 18% viewings, 15% second offers, 13% qualifying, 12% continuation, 10% interest, 10% responsiveness
Composite score
ranked agents only (4+ conversations)
Caseload versus depth
dot size = messages sent per client
Caseload against answer speed
how many customers each agent holds, against how fast they answer them · bubble size = rooms sent
Load-adjusted performance
the same work divided by the book that produced it — a big caseload is not an excuse, but it is context
Full comparison
click any row to open that agent ·